Reference |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result of Statistical Analysis |
Das M, 2011 |
|
|
ETDT P-value=0.63, X2(1df)=0.23, RR=1; allelic fr......
ETDT P-value=0.63, X2(1df)=0.23, RR=1; allelic frequencies COCAPHASE P-value=0.57, X2=0.33 for 3R; ETDT P-value=0.63, X2(1df)=0.23, RR=0.86; allelic frequencies COCAPHASE P-value=0.57, X2=0.33 for 4R
More...
|
the data was statistically not significant in either case-co......
the data was statistically not significant in either case-control or family-based analysis
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Ilott NE, 2010 |
|
|
QTDT AW P-value=0.2, X2=4.68, df=3 at age 2; QTDT......
QTDT AW P-value=0.2, X2=4.68, df=3 at age 2; QTDT AW P-value=0.81, X2=0.05, df=3 at age 3
More...
|
no significant association
no significant association
|
Non-significant
|
Gizer IR, 2009 |
|
|
Meta-analysis model: Random: OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.72-1.43, P-va......
Meta-analysis model: Random: OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.72-1.43, P-value=0.464; Q-statistic: P-value=0.009, I2=67
More...
|
no evidence to suggest an association between this polymorph......
no evidence to suggest an association between this polymorphisms and ADHD
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Nyman ES, 2007 |
|
|
No available information.
No available information.
|
No evidence of association was seen.
No evidence of association was seen.
|
Non-significant
|
El-Tarras, A. E., 2012 |
|
|
allelic P-value=0.1, OR=1.4, CI=0.9-2.1 for allele 2; P-valu......
allelic P-value=0.1, OR=1.4, CI=0.9-2.1 for allele 2; P-value=0.07, OR=0.7, CI=0.5-1.0 for allele 3; P-value=0.5, OR=1.1, CI=0.8-1.6 for allele 4; P-value=0.9, OR=1, CI=0.7-1.3 for allele 5; P-value=0.6, OR=0.9, CI=0.7-1.3 for short allele; P-value=0.6, OR=1.1, CI=0.8-1.5 for long allele; genotypic P-value=0.01, OR=0.4, CI=0.2-0.8 for 3/3; P-value=0.5, OR=1.3, CI=0.5-3.5 for 3/5; P-value<0.01, OR=3, CI=1.3-7.0 for 3/4; P-value<0.01, OR=4.9, CI=2.4-11.1 for 4/4; P-value=0.7, OR=0.9, CI=0.5-1.6; P-value=0.8, OR=0.9, CI=0.4-2.0 for 5/5; P-value=0.8, OR=0.9, CI=0.4-2.0 for 4/5; P-value=0.3, OR=0.6, CI=0.2-1.4
More...
|
MAOA genotypes 3/4 and 3/2 showed highly significant associa......
MAOA genotypes 3/4 and 3/2 showed highly significant association with ADHD (OR = 3 and 4.9) respectively, while no significant association was fond with MAOA alleles. It is also worth to mention that the P value for association with genotype 3 was 0.07 which is not very far from the level of significance.
More...
|
Significant
|
Manor I, 2002 (b) |
2-5 repeat |
long repeat (4,5R) |
Family-based TDT P-value=0.036; case-control allele test Pea......
Family-based TDT P-value=0.036; case-control allele test Pearson P-value=0.047 (df=3) for male sample; case-control genotype P-value=0.0032 (df=3), allele P-value=0.0007 (df=2) for female sample
More...
|
preferential transmission of the long alleles was observed. ......
preferential transmission of the long alleles was observed. In case-control analysis, significant difference in allele frequency was also observed.
More...
|
Significant
|
Lawson DC, 2003 |
|
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.45, X2(1df)=0.58 in full sa......
allelic TDT P-value=0.45, X2(1df)=0.58 in full sample, allelic TDT P-value=0.25, X2(1df)=1.32 in male probands;
More...
|
there was no evidence of association with ADHD using case co......
there was no evidence of association with ADHD using case control analysis; no preferential transmission of alleles was found in the total sample or in the male probands only
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Lung FW, 2006 |
|
|
Chi-square test: P-value=0.273 (df=3) for allele, P-value=0.......
Chi-square test: P-value=0.273 (df=3) for allele, P-value=0.155 (df=1) for long/short form alleles
More...
|
No association was found.
No association was found.
|
Non-significant
|
Xu X, 2007(a) |
|
|
Single marker TDT P-value=0.120
Single marker TDT P-value=0.120
|
The association was not significant
The association was not significant
|
Non-significant
|
Domschke K, 2005 |
|
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.39, X2=0.9, df=1
allelic TDT P-value=0.39, X2=0.9, df=1
|
did not show any significant distortion in the transmission ......
did not show any significant distortion in the transmission to ADHD cases
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Das M, 2006 |
|
|
3.5 repeat allele LRS=5.365, df=1, P-value=0.02, OR=1 in COC......
3.5 repeat allele LRS=5.365, df=1, P-value=0.02, OR=1 in COCAPHASE Analysis; LRS=2.29, df=1, HHRR P-value=0.13, OR=1 for full sample and 3.5 repeat allele HHRR P-value=0.005, LRS=7.97, df=1, OR=1 for male probands based on unphased data in TDTPHASE Analysis; 3.5 repeat allele ETDT P-value=0.046, LRS=3.985, df=1 for male probands based on phased data in TDTPHASE Analysis
More...
|
the short 3.5 repeat allele of the MAOA-u VNTR is probably a......
the short 3.5 repeat allele of the MAOA-u VNTR is probably associated with ADHD in their population and could be the reason for making boys prone to ADHD as compared to girls
More...
|
Significant
|