Reference |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result of Statistical Analysis |
Xu X, 2008(b) |
T/C |
|
TDT P-value=0.004, OR=0.26 in ST1; TDT P-value=0.22, OR=0.54......
TDT P-value=0.004, OR=0.26 in ST1; TDT P-value=0.22, OR=0.54 in ST2; TDT P-value=0.03, OR=0.31 in MGH; TDT P-value=0.16, OR=0.33 in Dublin; TDT P-value=0.00008, OR=0.34 in TOTAL; P-value=0.003, OR=0.21 in ST1; P-value=0.3, OR=0.59 in ST2, P-value=0.12, OR=0.32 in Dublin; P-value=0.007, OR=0.34 in Total, for allele counts
More...
|
the overall evidence of association was significant across a......
the overall evidence of association was significant across all four datasets
More...
|
Significant
|
Kim JW, 2008 |
|
|
X2=4.765, P-value=0.029, OR=3.25; X2=1......
X2=4.765, P-value=0.029, OR=3.25; X2=10.3, P-value=0.0013, OR=3.37 in the combined study
More...
|
shows positive associations
shows positive associations
|
Significant
|
Ilott NE, 2010 |
|
|
QTDT AT P-value=0.04, X2=4.38, df=1, at age 2; QT......
QTDT AT P-value=0.04, X2=4.38, df=1, at age 2; QTDT AT P-value=0.13, X2=0.58, df=1, at age 3
More...
|
modest, nominally significant associations in the AT test at......
modest, nominally significant associations in the AT test at age 2
More...
|
Significant
|
Brookes K, 2006 |
A/G |
|
UNPHASED TDT P-value=0.0153
UNPHASED TDT P-value=0.0153
|
significant association was observed in UNPHASED analysis
significant association was observed in UNPHASED analysis
|
Significant
|
Sengupta, S. M., 2012 |
C/T |
|
P-value=0.56, Z statistic (allele 1)=0.58
P-value=0.56, Z statistic (allele 1)=0.58
|
No significant association was found in this study.
No significant association was found in this study.
|
Non-significant
|