Reference |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result of Statistical Analysis |
Sarkar, K., 2012 |
T/C |
|
allelic P-value=1, X2=0.0 for case-control, P-va......
allelic P-value=1, X2=0.0 for case-control, P-value=1, X2=0.0 for family-based; genotypic P-value=0.09, X2=4.78 for case-control, P-value=0.32, X2=2.28 for family-based; X2=1.8, TDT P-value=0.18, Relative risk (95% CI)=2.25 (1.0¨C5.22)
More...
|
Case-control analysis revealed lack of any significant diffe......
Case-control analysis revealed lack of any significant difference in allelic frequencies between ADHD probands, their parents and controls P>0.05. rs362569 and rs1051312 failed to reveal any preferential transmission.
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Ilott NE, 2010 |
|
|
QTDT AT P-value=0.43, X2=0.63, df=1, QTDT AW P-va......
QTDT AT P-value=0.43, X2=0.63, df=1, QTDT AW P-value=0.85, X2=0.04, df=1 at age 2; QTDT AT P-value=0.58, X2=0, df=1, QTDT AW P-value=0.42, X2=0.65, df=1 at age 3
More...
|
no significant association
no significant association
|
Non-significant
|
Gizer IR, 2009 |
|
|
Meta-analysis model: Random: OR=1.06, 95% CI=0.86-1.31, P-va......
Meta-analysis model: Random: OR=1.06, 95% CI=0.86-1.31, P-value=0.298; Q-statistic: P-value=0.084, I2=48
More...
|
no evidence to suggest an association between this polymorph......
no evidence to suggest an association between this polymorphisms and ADHD
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Mill J, 2004 (b) |
T/C |
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.16, X2=1.95; HHRR P-value=0......
allelic TDT P-value=0.16, X2=1.95; HHRR P-value=0.21, X2=1.56; PDT P-value=0.17, X2=1.90, TRANSMIT P-value=0.25, X2=1.33 in parental samples.
More...
|
the marker was not individually associated with ADHD in this......
the marker was not individually associated with ADHD in this sample
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Kustanovich V, 2003 |
T/C |
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.420, allelic TDT P-value=0.131 for pat......
allelic TDT P-value=0.420, allelic TDT P-value=0.131 for paternal transmission
More...
|
TDT of individual alleles did not reach statistical signific......
TDT of individual alleles did not reach statistical significance
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Brophy K, 2002 |
T/C |
DdeI |
HHRR analysis: overall P-value=0.01, RR=1.51; paternal trans......
HHRR analysis: overall P-value=0.01, RR=1.51; paternal transmission P-value=0.019, RR=2.0; maternal transmission P-value=0.10, RR=1.45; TDT analysis: overall P-value=0.015, RR=2.13; paternal transmission P-value=0.013, RR=6.0; maternal transmission P-value=0.17, RR=1.9
More...
|
increased preferential transmission was found
increased preferential transmission was found
|
Significant
|
Feng Y, 2005(b) |
T/C |
|
allelic TDT P-value=0.286, X2=1.14 in Irvine samp......
allelic TDT P-value=0.286, X2=1.14 in Irvine sample; allelic TDT P-value=0.933, X2=0.007 in Toronto sample
More...
|
there was no significant result both in the Toronto sample a......
there was no significant result both in the Toronto sample and the Irvine sample
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Barr CL, 2000 (a) |
T/C |
|
TDT P-value=0.074
TDT P-value=0.074
|
no significant evidence for biased transmission
no significant evidence for biased transmission
|
Non-significant
|
Kim JW, 2007 |
T/C |
C |
Combined TDT P-value=0.69 (OR=1.03); Single marker analysis ......
Combined TDT P-value=0.69 (OR=1.03); Single marker analysis FBAT P-value=0.894; Exploratory analyses FBAT P-value=0.475 for co-morbid CD, P-value=0.211 for co-morbid MDD, P-value=0.219 for co-morbid BD
More...
|
No association was found between ADHD or co-morbidities of A......
No association was found between ADHD or co-morbidities of ADHD and this SNP
More...
|
Non-significant
|
Forero DA, 2009 |
C/T |
|
|
Not significant for the total samples.
Not significant for the total samples.
|
Non-significant
|