- Hot Results
- Quick Search
- Large-scale studies
- Genome-wide Association Studies of ADHD
- Genome-wide Linkage Studies of ADHD
- Genome-wide CNV Analyses of ADHD
- Meta-analysis Studies of ADHD
- Data Summary
Gene Report
Approved Symbol | DRD1 |
---|---|
Approved Name | dopamine receptor D1 |
Location | 5q34-q35 |
Position | chr5:174867675-174871163, - |
External Links |
HGNC: 3020 Entrez Gene: 1812 Ensembl: ENSG00000184845 UCSC: uc003mcz.2 |
No. of Studies | 8 (significant: 5; non-significant: 3; trend: 0) |
Source | Literature-origin; Mapped by LD-proxy; Mapped by literature SNP |
Reference | Statistical Values/Author Comments | Result of Statistical Analysis |
---|---|---|
Nyman ES, 2007 | No evidence of association was seen. | Non-significant |
Oades RD, 2008 | 1 SNP showed significant association | Significant |
Bobb AJ, 2005 | revealed significant association of two SNPs with ADHD | Significant |
Brookes K, 2006 | UNPHASED TDT P-value=0.00847, global P-value=0.0454, WHAP TDT P_sum P-value=0.231, one or more SNPs with nominal P-value<0.05 located in this gene | Significant |
Ribases, M., 2012 | The single- and multiple-marker analysis in both population and family-based approaches provided preliminary evidence for the contribution of DRD1 to combined-type ADHD in children (P=8.8e-04; OR=1.50 (1.18-1.90) and P=0.0061; OR=1.73 (1.23-2.45)) but not in adults. The replication of the association between DRD1 and ADHD in two European cohorts highlights the validity of our finding and supports the involvement of DRD1 in childhood ADHD. | Significant |
Wang G. X., 2012 | SNP rs5326 mapped to this gene showed no association with ADHD in this study. | Non-significant |
Kirley A, 2002 | HHRR: P=0.64 (RR=1.06, OR=1.1); TDT: P=0.708 (OR=1.13); TDT by presence of family history: P=0.509 (OR[95%CI]=1.78[0.48-6.62]); TDT of Paternal and Maternal transmissions: P=0.78 (OR[95%CI]=0.85[0.26-2.78]). No preferential transmission of alleles to ADHD children was observed | Non-significant |
Misener VL, 2004 (a) | TRANSMIT haplotype analysis: P=0.22 for GCAT, P=0.045 for CCAT, P=0.008 for GCAC; FBAT analysis of haplotype GCAC: P=0.024 for Parent-reported IN, P=0.03 for Teacher-reported IN, P=0.094 for Parent-reported HI, P=0.169 for Teacher-reported HI; Logistic regression analysis of haplotype GCAC (D1P.6 as proxy): P=0.008 (OR[95% CI]=1.230[1.034¨C1.462]) for Parent-reported IN, P=0.045 (OR[95% CI]=1.175[0.973¨C1.418]) for Teacher-reported IN, P=0.266 (OR[95% CI]=1.050[0.902¨C1.222]) for Parent-reported HI, P=0.259 (OR[95% CI]=0.952[0.821¨C1.104]) for Teacher-reported HI. These findings support the proposed involvement of DRD1 in ADHD. | Significant |
Literature-origin SNPs (count: 12)
rs_ID | Location | Functional Annotation | No. of Studies (significant/non-significant/trend) |
---|---|---|---|
rs265973 | Chr5:174860699(Fwd) | 1(0/1/0) | |
rs265975 | Chr5:174862195(Fwd) | 1(0/1/0) | |
rs265977 | Chr5:174863257(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
rs10061709 | Chr5:174871055(Fwd) | 5_prime_UTR_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
rs265981 | Chr5:174870902(Fwd) | 5_prime_UTR_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 2(1/1/0) |
rs267418 | Chr5:174880645(Fwd) | upstream_gene_variant | 1(0/1/0) |
rs686 | Chr5:174868700(Fwd) | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2(1/1/0) |
rs835616 | Chr5:174863690(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
rs863126 | Chr5:174863348(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
rs5326 | Chr5:174870196(Fwd) | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1(0/1/0) |
rs4532 | Chr5:174870150(Fwd) | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
rs835541 | Chr5:174863576(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
LD-proxies (count: 5)
rs_ID | Location | Functional Annotation |
---|---|---|
rs28465440 | Chr5:174866541(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant |
rs12518222 | Chr5:174867169(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant |
rs265978 | Chr5:174863905(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant |
rs11749676 | Chr5:174866298(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant |
rs703748 | Chr5:174866036(Fwd) | downstream_gene_variant |
Variant Name | Variant Type | Location in Gene | No. of Studies (significant/non-significant/trend) |
---|---|---|---|
DRD1_5'-UTR_-800T/C_HaeIII | point mutation | 5'-UTR | 1 (0/1/0) |
DRD1_upstream_-1251G/C_HaeIII | point mutation | ~0.2 kb upstream of one of two promoters for DRD1 | 1 (0/1/0) |
DRD1_3'-UTR_+1403T/C_Bsp1286I | point mutation | 3'-UTR | 1 (0/1/0) |
DRD1_5'-UTR_-48G/A_DdeI | point mutation | 5'-UTR | 1 (0/1/0) |
GO terms by PBA (with statistical significance of FDR<0.05) (count: 0)
GO terms by database search (count: 51)
ID | Name | No. of Genes in ADHDgene | Brief Description |
---|---|---|---|
hsa04080 | Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction | 93 | |
hsa04020 | Calcium signaling pathway | 63 | Ca2+ that enters the cell from the outside is a principal so...... Ca2+ that enters the cell from the outside is a principal source of signal Ca2+. Entry of Ca2+ is driven by the presence of a large electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane. Cells use this external source of signal Ca2+ by activating various entry channels with widely different properties. The voltage-operated channels (VOCs) are found in excitable cells and generate the rapid Ca2+ fluxes that control fast cellular processes. There are many other Ca2+-entry channels, such as the receptor-operated channels (ROCs), for example the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors (NMDARs) that respond to glutamate. There also are second-messenger-operated channels (SMOCs) and store-operated channels (SOCs). More... |
hsa04540 | Gap junction | 27 | Gap junctions contain intercellular channels that allow dire...... Gap junctions contain intercellular channels that allow direct communication between the cytosolic compartments of adjacent cells. Each gap junction channel is formed by docking of two 'hemichannels', each containing six connexins, contributed by each neighboring cell. These channels permit the direct transfer of small molecules including ions, amino acids, nucleotides, second messengers and other metabolites between adjacent cells. Gap junctional communication is essential for many physiological events, including embryonic development, electrical coupling, metabolic transport, apoptosis, and tissue homeostasis. Communication through Gap Junction is sensitive to a variety of stimuli, including changes in the level of intracellular Ca2+, pH, transjunctional applied voltage and phosphorylation/dephosphorylation processes. This figure represents the possible activation routes of different protein kinases involved in Cx43 and Cx36 phosphorylation. More... |
Region: chr5:174867675..174871163 View in gBrowse
Copyright: Bioinformatics Lab, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Feedback
Last update: Feb 26, 2014